Qantas A380 operated multiple flights with tool left inside engine after being released for service

Critical safety report comes days after another Qantas plane suffered a contained engine failure

0
664
(PHOTO: Shutterstock)

Inter AirportsA Qantas A380 operated multiple flights with a tool inside one of its engines after maintenance engineers did not commence the lost tool procedure prior to the aircraft being released to service, an ATSB investigation report showed.

Read the ATSB report here.

The 1.25 m long nylon tool, used to turn the engine’s intermediate‑pressure compressor during borescope inspections, was found wedged against the low-pressure compressor outlet guide vanes during a scheduled maintenance check at Los Angeles on 1 January 2024. It was determined that that the tool had been left in the engine during previous scheduled maintenance in Los Angeles on 6 December 2023.

A Qantas A380 operated multiple flights with a tool inside one of its engines after engineers did not commence the lost tool procedure
(IMAGE: ATSB)

Between the two maintenance checks, the Qantas aircraft had flown 34 cycles, totalling 294 hours, with the tool in the engine. Although the tool was found to have been deformed by high energy airflow, there was no damage observed to the engine itself.

“The ATSB investigation found that maintenance engineers did not notice the tool had been left in the engine’s low-pressure compressor case when conducting checks for foreign objects at the completion of the borescope inspection task,” ATSB Chief Commissioner Angus Mitchell said. “Further, maintenance engineers did not commence the lost tool procedure once the tool had been identified as missing, and the certifying engineer released the aircraft for service with the tool unaccounted for.”

After the tool was discovered, Qantas Engineering immediately briefed staff on the importance of ensuring all tooling is returned and actioned by tool store personnel. The operator also completed an internal investigation, which resulted in an internal safety directive regarding complying with company tool control requirements.

“Foreign object debris and damage can pose a significant threat to the safe operation of aircraft, which is why regulations, procedures and training are in place to limit the risk of foreign object damage, especially from introduced objects during maintenance,” Mitchell noted. “Correctly applying tool control is fundamental to mitigating against any human errors that may arise.”

The report comes just days after another Qantas plane suffered an engine failure and had to return to the airport. Qantas said the “contained engine failure” happened soon after taking off from Sydney Airport last week, sparking a grassfire on a nearby runway and causing several flights to be diverted.

The Qantas flight, QF520, was bound for Brisbane and was circling for a “short period of time” before landing safely back at Sydney Airport, Qantas Chief Pilot Captain Richard Tobiano said in the statement. There was no initial word on the number of people on board.

“Qantas engineers have conducted a preliminary inspection of the engine and confirmed it was a contained engine failure,” the airline said. “While customers would have heard a loud bang, there was not an explosion.”

AAV_Bulletin


For Editorial Inquiries Contact:
Editor Matt Driskill at matt.driskill@asianaviation.com
For Advertising Inquiries Contact:
Head of Sales Kay Rolland at kay.rolland@asianaviation.com

AAV Media Kit
Previous articleAirbus says APAC will need 19,500 planes over next 20 years underscoring region’s continued growth
Next articleWorldACD: Spot rates rise further as peak season builds

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here