Families of Boeing crash victims ask court to reject plea deal

0
158
Boeing's multitude of legal and safety problems have slowed deliveries. (PHOTO: Shutterstock)

Aviation Festival AFA 728 x 90Families of the victims of two Boeing 737 MAX8 crashes filed a brief on 23 August asking a US federal court judge to reject a proposed plea agreement presented by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Boeing to resolve the pending criminal case. The judge has previously ruled that Boeing’s crime caused the deaths of 346 victims in the two deadly crashes. The families argue that the agreement improperly conceals the deadly consequences of Boeing’s crime.

The reply brief argues that the DOJ did not reasonably confer with the families about specific terms of the plea agreement.  It goes on to ask Judge Reed O’Connor, who is overseeing the criminal matter in federal district court in Fort Worth, Texas, to reject the plea deal because it blocks his ability to craft his own sentence for Boeing.

“The proposed plea deal is not only deceptive but morally reprehensible because it fails to hold Boeing accountable for killing 346 people,” said Paul Cassell, attorney for the families in this case and professor of the S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. “A judge can reject a plea deal that is not in the public interest, and this misleading and unfair deal is clearly against the public interest. The families ask Judge O’Connor to use his recognized authority to reject this inappropriate plea and airbrushed factual account of what happened.”

After a door plug flew off mid-air of an Alaska Airlines jet in January, the DOJ found in May that Boeing had breached its obligations under a previously entered Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA).  In July, DOJ announced a proposed plea deal that recommends Judge O’Connor impose a fine of only $243.6 million. The deal does not include any prosecution of Boeing executives.

The families argue in their brief that that the fine is an inadequate response to what Judge O’Connor previously called “the deadliest corporate crime in U.S. history.” And the families argue the remedial measures and monitoring that the agreement would provide are inadequate to protect the safety of the flying public. The families also argue that the proposed facts surrounding the plea deal misleadingly excludes the involvement of Boeing’s top executives in the crime.

The Foundation for Aviation Safety held a press conference where it revealed heretofore unreleased documents that detail mechanical and electrical issues with the 737 MAX jet that continues to be manufactured and continues to fly thousands of passengers daily.

AAV_Bulletin_NEWS


For Editorial Inquiries Contact:
Editor Matt Driskill at matt.driskill@asianaviation.com
For Advertising Inquiries Contact:
Head of Sales Kay Rolland at kay.rolland@asianaviation.com

AAV Media Kit
Previous articleAir Astana boosts Phuket service
Next articleMHI and JAL sign MOU for MRO

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here