AAPA CAUTIONS AGAINST OVER-REACTION ON INFLIGHT ELECTRONICS
Wider consultation needed involving governments and industry
on effective alternative approaches
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia –
Air passengers today travel with multiple personal electronic devices (PEDs), such as a laptop, tablet, and mobile phone, and have high expectations of being able to do work, watch films, and stay connected to the internet and social media, even while on board aircraft. Airlines are responding to this demand by investing heavily in inflight connectivity in newer passenger aircraft.
Air passengers are already subject to onerous and inconsistent security screening measures prior to boarding a flight, with wide variations in screening procedures at different airports. Many are calling for the streamlining of passenger processing in airports.
Recent bans on the carriage of laptops and large PEDs implemented by the US and UK on inbound flights from specific foreign airports raise many unanswered questions and have had led to significant changes in airline operations and disruption to the travelling public. Implemented at short notice without prior consultation with the airline industry, this has led to scenes of confusion at affected airports, as airlines scramble to comply with the new directives whilst at the same time, addressing unhappy passengers who can no longer have the use of their devices in the aircraft cabin. In addition, safety issues relating to large numbers of lithium battery powered PEDs being stowed in an aircraft cargo bay, contrary to recognized best safety practices, remain unresolved.
The travelling public understand that no society can credibly claim to provide perfect security. In the face of terrorist threats, it takes real political maturity to remain calm, and not fall into the trap of knee-jerk reactions, such as the imposition of new security measures with unproven effectiveness. Additional security measures should only be justified when it can be demonstrated that the benefits outweigh the additional burdens they impose on society.
Mr. Herdman added, “The ripple effects of such measures, and their proposed wider expansion, threaten to disrupt the global economy and impose far greater costs on society with no tangible public security benefits. This would only serve to further the aims of the terrorists, who measure their success by how much society over-reacts to their provocations. Rather than focus on generalized screening of innocent passengers, past experience with evolving threats and terrorist plots repeatedly highlight the critical importance of effective intelligence gathering and analysis.”
Mr. Herdman concluded, “Good security is all about comprehensive threat assessment and balanced risk management, not the elimination of every conceivable risk. Aviation security is a collective global responsibility and requires effective consultation to ensure that security measures are practical, cost effective and sustainable whilst minimising the impact on the wider travelling public. We urge governments, in conjunction with the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), to work together more closely with industry, and strengthen multilateral cooperation in further developing aviation security measures.”